A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
- Vol. 15 (2) , 85-91
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009982611386
Abstract
Introduction. Bias and precision statistics have succeeded regression analysis when measurement techniques are compared. However, when applied to cardiac output measurements, inconsistencies occur in...Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of impedance cardiography with indirect fick (CO2) method of measuring cardiac output in healthy children during exerciseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- A comparison of the use of transoesophageal Doppler and thermodilution techniques for cardiac output determinationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1996
- Cardiac output measurement: Lack of agreement between thermodilution and thoracic electric bioimpedance in two clinical settingsJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1995
- Transtracheal Doppler Cardiac Output MonitoringAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1994
- Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1993
- Measurement of cardiac output-transtracheal Doppler versus thermodilutionCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1991
- Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: The bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgeryIntensive Care Medicine, 1991
- Simultaneous Intraoperative Measurement of Cardiac Output by Thermodilution and Transtracheal DopplerAnesthesiology, 1991
- Noninvasive Cardiac Output: Simultaneous Comparison of Two Different Methods with ThermodilutionAnesthesiology, 1990
- Relationship of bioimpedance to thermodilution and echocardiographic measurements of cardiac functionCritical Care Medicine, 1990