Phase III trial of The Japanese Urological Cancer Research Group for Adriamycin: cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and cisplatinum versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary A non-randomized clinical study on systemic combination chemotherapy was conducted by the Japanese Urological Cancer Research Group for Adriamycin to compare the effectiveness of CAP (cyclophosphamide 200–500 mg/m2, adriamycin 30–50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 30–50 mg/m2) and CAF (cyclophosphamide 200–500 mg/m2, adriamycin 30–50 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 250 mg/m2) in 123 patients (104 evaluable) with advanced and/or metastatic cancer of the urinary bladder. Among 96 patients who were non-randomly selected to receive CAP, 4 achieved complete remission, 12 achieved partial remission, 7 achieved minor response, 30 had stable disease, and 43 had disease progression. The response in the 8 patients who received CAF were: partial remission in 1 and progressive disease in 7. The overall response rate to CAP therapy was 17%, as against 13% for CAF therapy. The median duration of survival with CAP was 29 weeks and with CAF, 22 weeks. The differences between the two groups in duration of survival and response rate were not statistically significant. Complete and/or partial remissions were observed in the lymph nodes, lung and liver in 32%, 24%, and 57% of cases, respectively. There was no objective response in bone metastasis. The main side effects of CAP were anorexia (88%), nausea and/or vomiting (81%), alopecia (65%), leukopenia (72%), anemia (48%), and renal dysfunction (17%). No patients died as a result of toxicity of these combination chemotherapy modalities.