Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: An examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations
- 1 February 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Child Abuse & Neglect
- Vol. 18 (2) , 113-129
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(94)90114-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploration of anatomical dolls by nonreferred preschool-aged children: Comparisons by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic statusChild Abuse & Neglect, 1994
- Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1991
- Children's Use of Anatomically Detailed Dolls to Recount an EventChild Development, 1990
- The Response of Young, Non‐Sexually Abused Children to Anatomically Correct DollsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1989
- The Use of Anatomical Dolls in Child Witness InterviewsAdoption & Fostering, 1989
- Anatomical DollsJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 1988
- An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children with anatomically correct dollsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1987
- CHILD SEXUAL ABUSEThe Lancet, 1987
- Reliable and Fictitious Accounts of Sexual Abuse to ChildrenJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 1987
- Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dollsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1986