Exploration of anatomical dolls by nonreferred preschool-aged children: Comparisons by age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status
- 28 February 1994
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Child Abuse & Neglect
- Vol. 18 (2) , 139-153
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(94)90116-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: An examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluationsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1994
- Use of Anatomical dolls by Boston-area professionalsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1992
- Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1991
- Evaluating children's reports of sexual abuse: Results from a survey of professionals.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Methodology in Consultation-Liaison Research: A Classification of BiasesPsychosomatics, 1990
- Age and Social-Class Differences in Children's Knowledge of SexualityJournal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1990
- The Response of Young, Non‐Sexually Abused Children to Anatomically Correct DollsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1989
- Interaction of normal children with anatomical dollsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1988
- Use of anatomical dolls among professionals in sexual abuse evaluationsChild Abuse & Neglect, 1988
- Anatomically Correct Dolls: Should They be Used as the Basis for Expert Testimony?Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1988