Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives
Top Cited Papers
- 15 June 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 361 (1471) , 1137-1148
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1853
Abstract
Psychophysical comparisons seem to show that obese individuals experience normal sweet and fat sensations, they like sweetness the same or less, but like fat more than the non-obese do. These psychophysical comparisons have been made using scales (visual analogue or category) that assume intensity labels (e.g.extremely) which denote the same absolute perceived intensity to all. In reality, the perceived intensities denoted by labels vary because they depend on experiences with the substances to be judged. This variation makes comparisons invalid. Valid comparisons can be made by asking the subjects to rate their sensory/hedonic experiences in contexts that are not related to the specific experiences of interest. Using this methodology, we present the evidence that the sensory and hedonic properties of sweet and fat vary with body mass index. The obese live in different orosensory and orohedonic worlds than do the non-obese; the obese experience reduced sweetness, which probably intensifies fat sensations, and the obese like both sweet and fat more than the non-obese do. Genetic variation as well as taste pathology contribute to these results. These psychophysical advances will impact experimental as well as clinical studies of obesity and other eating disorders.Keywords
This publication has 103 references indexed in Scilit:
- From psychophysics to the clinic: missteps and advancesFood Quality and Preference, 2004
- Genetic and Environmental Variation in TasteTopics in Clinical Nutrition, 2003
- Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in tasteFood Quality and Preference, 2003
- Sensory and Hedonic Judgments of Common Foods by Lean Consumers and Consumers with ObesityObesity Research, 1998
- Preliminary Findings of Genetic Taste Status Association with Fat Intake and Body Mass Index in Adult FemalesJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 1995
- Taste and Smell in DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Taste and Smell in DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Responsiveness of dog thalamic neurons to taste stimulation of various tongue regionsPhysiology & Behavior, 1982
- Calories and sweet taste: Effects on sucrose preference in the obese and nonobesePhysiology & Behavior, 1972
- Phenylthiocarbamide taste sensitivity and its relationship to growth variationAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1966