Intraoperative Cholangiography Revisited
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 127 (4) , 448-450
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420040094016
Abstract
• The charts of 1351 patients undergoing cholecystectomy at our institutions from 1985 through 1989 were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate the indications for and the success of intraoperative cholangiography. A total of 800 patients underwent intraoperative cholangiography. They were divided into two groups based on the absence (CR−) or presence (CR+) of clinical and/or operative criteria suggestive of the existence of common bile duct stones. Intraoperative cholangiography in CR− patients was of limited benefit, being negative (normal) in 95.7%, true-positive (abnormal) in 3.3%, and false-positive in 1%. False-positive intraoperative cholangiography resulted in unnecessary common bile duct explorations. Intraoperative cholangiography in CR+ patients proved useful, avoiding unnecessary common bile duct exploration in 55%. In those select CR+ patients with palpable common bile duct stones or cholangitis, little additional information was gained by the intraoperative cholangiography. We conclude that routine screening intraoperative cholangiography in CR− patients be reconsidered, as should the use of intraoperative cholangiography in CR+ patients with a palpable common bile duct stone or cholangitis. Intraoperative cholangiography in the remainder of CR+ patients proved beneficial and should be continued. (Arch Surg. 1992;127:448-450)Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Utility of routine intraoperative cholangiogram during cholecystectomy in children: A nationwide analysis of outcomes and readmissionsJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2020
- The case for selective cholangiographyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Potential hazards of intraoperative cholangiography in patients with infected bile.Gut, 1982
- The value of routine peroperative cholangiography—a report of 4000 cholecystectomiesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982
- PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY: ROUTINE OR SELECTIVE?Anz Journal of Surgery, 1982
- The case against routine operative cholangiographyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Exploration of the common bile duct—the relevance of the clinical picture and the importance of peroperative cholangiographyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Cost-effectiveness of operative cholangiographyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1979
- Calculous biliary tract diseaseCurrent Problems in Surgery, 1975
- Gallstone Migration as a Cause of Acute PancreatitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974