Quantitative analysis of the kinetics of denaturation and renaturation of barstar in the folding transition zone
Open Access
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Protein Science
- Vol. 3 (9) , 1409-1417
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560030907
Abstract
The fluorescence-monitored kinetics of folding and unfolding of barstar by guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl) in the folding transition zone, at pH 7, 25 °C, have been quantitatively analyzed using a 3-state mechanism: US → UF →N. US and UF are slow-refolding and fast-refolding unfolded forms of barstar, and N is the native protein. US and UF probably differ in possessing trans and cis conformations, respectively, of the Tyr 47-Pro 48 bond. The 3-state model could be used because the kinetics of folding and unfolding of barstar show 2 phases, a fast phase and a slow phase, and because the relative amplitudes of the 2 phases depend only on the final refolding conditions and not on the initial conditions. Analysis of the observed kinetics according to the 3-state model yields the values of the 4 microscopic rate constants that describe the transitions between the 3 states at different concentrations of GdnHCl. The value of the equilibrium unfolded ratio US:UF (K21) and the values of the rate constants of the US → UF and UF → US reactions, k12 and k21 respectively, are shown to be independent of the concentration of GdnHCl. K21 has a value of 2.1 ± 0.1, and k12 and k21 have values of 5.3 × 10−3 s−1 and 11.2 × 10−3 s−1, respectively. Double-jump experiments that monitor reactions that are silent to fluorescence monitoring were used to confirm the values of K21, k12, and k21 obtained from the 3-state analysis and thereby the validity of the 3-state model. The 3-state model does not account for the kinetics of folding in the pretransition region, where folding occurs by 2 parallel pathways, UF → N, and US → IN → N, and IN is a native-like intermediate. The rate constants of the UF → N and US → IN reactions are both similar, with values of 37 s−1 in water. The IN → N reaction, which involves the same trans-cis isomerization process as the US → UF reaction, occurs with a rate constant of 16 × 10−3 s−1 and is independent of GdnHCl concentration. Thus, trans-cis isomerization occurs 3 times faster in the folding intermediate than in the unfolded state.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assignment of the backbone1H and15N NMR resonances and secondary structure characterization of barstarFEBS Letters, 1993
- Protein folding in vitroCurrent Opinion in Biotechnology, 1992
- Kinetic coupling between protein folding and prolyl isomerizationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1992
- Kinetic coupling between protein folding and prolyl isomerizationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1992
- Barnase and barstarJournal of Molecular Biology, 1988
- Replacement of proline-76 with alanine eliminates the slowest kinetic phase in thioredoxin foldingBiochemistry, 1987
- Proline isomerization during refolding of ribonuclease A is accelerated by the presence of folding intermediatesFEBS Letters, 1986
- Unfolding and refolding of the constant fragment of the immunoglobulin light chainJournal of Molecular Biology, 1982
- The rate of interconversion between the two unfolded forms of ribonuclease A does not depend on guanidinium chloride concentrationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1979
- Test of the extended two-state model for the kinetic intermediates observed in the folding transition of ribonuclease AJournal of Molecular Biology, 1978