Who Plugged the Gap? Re-Examining The Woodfuel Crisis in Zimbabwe
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Energy & Environment
- Vol. 9 (3) , 235-255
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x9800900302
Abstract
The woodfuel gap theory emerged in the 1980s and gave rise to a development push which targeted aid towards woodfuel production and the alleviation of the woodfuel crisis. A close inspection of the situation in Zimbabwe indicates that gap theory fails to encompass the dynamics of rural production, wood use and management, or deforestation. It provided a poor basis for the Rural Afforestation Programme, which ultimately failed to identify and address woodfuel problems. It is argued that woodfuel problems are localised, complex in their origins and dynamics; and collectively do not amount to a woodfuel “crisis”. Woodfuel shortages are not necessarily linked to deforestation, nor can they be addressed simply by planting trees. Gap theory simplifies and obscures the individuality of woodfuel supply and demand balances and should be abandoned.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Availability and use of trees in Mutanda Resettlement Area, ZimbabweForest Ecology and Management, 1993
- The State and Agrarian Change in Zimbabwe’s Communal AreasPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- The use of wild fruits in ZimbabweEconomic Botany, 1987
- Soil erosion, conservationism and ideas about development: a Southern African exploration, 1900–1960Journal of Southern African Studies, 1984
- Fuelwood crisis causing unfortunate land use – and the other way aroundNorsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 1979