The Limitations of Behavioural Approaches to Teaching: Some Implications for Special Education
- 1 November 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Exceptional Child
- Vol. 34 (3) , 197-212
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655870340305
Abstract
Behavioural strategies have made an important contribution to the development of programs for children with special needs. A review of theory and research suggests, however, that the behavioural task analysis, stimulus‐response approach is not an appropriate nor effective model for interactive teaching. Behavioural methods present problems because they emphasize the control of learning by the instructor, thus devaluing pupil initiation and its importance in an educational setting. Interactions between learners and teachers usually are more complex than those involved in behavioural instruction; i n particular, mainstream teaching strategies allow for some pupil control over learning. This paper compares approaches to teaching derived from behavioural technology with those used by effective teachers and examines some of the implications for educational programs for children with special learning needs, in particular those with severe multiple disabilities.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teaching Telephone Skills in a Workshop Setting to Adults who Have Intellectual Handicaps: Two Data-Based Case StudiesAustralia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1987
- Teaching five special needs children in a regular primary classroom using a consultation‐collaboration modelThe Exceptional Child, 1986
- Collateral Effects from Teaching Attention, Imitation and Toy Interaction Behaviors to a Developmentally Handicapped ChildChild & Family Behavior Therapy, 1986
- Child Learning and Development in Context: strategies for analysing behaviour‐environment interactions and a proposal for research into everyday experiencesEducational Psychology, 1986
- The Jack Tizzard Memorial Lecture Decreasing Behaviours: Clinical, Ethical, and Environmental IssuesAustralia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1985
- Special Education as a Moral EnterpriseLearning Disability Quarterly, 1984
- The Polyphony of Learning in the Learning DisabledLearning Disability Quarterly, 1984
- Issues in the Instruction of Mildly Mentally Retarded ChildrenEducational Researcher, 1984
- A Closer Look at MainstreamingThe Educational Forum, 1983
- The judged, not the judges: An insider's view of mental retardation.American Psychologist, 1976