House Re-elections and Senate Defeats: The Role of the Challenger
- 1 October 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 10 (4) , 441-460
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400002337
Abstract
The advantage of incumbency has long intrigued students of congressional elections. Whether measured at individual or aggregate levels, by re-election rates or voting margins, the advantage has been striking: simply knowing that there is an incumbent in the contest supplies a major predictor of the vote. The person in office – the incumbent – is overwhelmingly likely to win re-election and to win by larger margins than victorious non-incumbents.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections, 1964-1974Political Science Quarterly, 1978
- The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1978
- A Note on the Detection of MulticollinearityAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1978
- The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did ItAmerican Political Science Review, 1977
- Election Outcomes: Whose Money Matters?The Journal of Politics, 1976
- Information and the Vote: a Comparative Election StudyAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1974
- Party and Incumbency in Postwar Senate Elections: Trends, Patterns, and ModelsAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- Party Government and the Saliency of CongressPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1962