After democracy, bureaucracy? Rejoinder to Ciepley
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Review
- Vol. 14 (1) , 113-137
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810008443553
Abstract
In a certain sense, voluntary communities and market relationships are relatively less coercive than democracy and bureaucracy: they offer more positive freedom. In that respect, they are more like romantic relationships or friendships than are democracies and bureaucracies. This tends to make voluntary communities and markets not only more pleasant forms of interaction, but more effective ones—contrary to Weber's confidence in the superior rationality of bureaucratic control.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are free markets the cause of financial instability?Critical Review, 2000
- Democracy despite voter ignorance: A Weberian reply to Somin and FriedmanCritical Review, 1999
- Voter ignorance and the democratic idealCritical Review, 1998
- Public ignorance and democratic theoryCritical Review, 1998
- What's wrong with LibertarianismCritical Review, 1997
- Freedom, self‐ownership, and libertarian philosophical DiasporaCritical Review, 1997
- Markets for public goods?Critical Review, 1993
- Market failureCritical Review, 1993