Training Judges to Generate Standard‐Setting Data
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
- Vol. 10 (2) , 11-14
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00187.x
Abstract
Is training judges beyond initial orientation required? How can we help judges apply their conceptualization of minimal competence to individual items?Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Use of Item Information by Judges Using Angoff and Nedeisky ProceduresJournal of Educational Measurement, 1988
- A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS ON THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- A Framework for Viewing the Process of Standard SettingEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1983
- A LATENT TRAIT METHOD FOR DETERMINING INTRAJUDGE INCONSISTENCY IN THE ANGOFF AND NEDELSKY TECHNIQUES OF STANDARD SETTINGJournal of Educational Measurement, 1982
- Standard Setting Issues and MethodsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- Bayesian Statistics, Credentialing Examinations, and the Determination of Passing PointsEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1979
- The Improvement of Estimates of Test DifficultyEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1953