Subtyping of reading disorders: Implications for remediation
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Dyslexia
- Vol. 34 (1) , 205-216
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02663621
Abstract
Present research methods do not seem to be leading us toward general agreement regarding reading disability subtypes. Even if there were agreement, conventional group research designs are not adequate for determining the optimal remedial procedure for each subtype. It is recommended that careful thought be given to the formulation of more appropriate theoretical frameworks and behavioral measures, and that single-subject research designs which yield information about subtypes and remediation effects be designed through collaboration of researchers and practitioners.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science.American Psychologist, 1983
- Neuropsychological characteristics of empirically derived subgroups of learning disabled readersJournal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1982
- An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review, 1981
- Identification of subtypes of retarded readers: A neuropsychological, multivariate approachJournal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1979
- Classification of Reading Problems by the Q-Technique of Factor AnalysisCortex, 1977
- Toward a theory of automatic information processing in readingCognitive Psychology, 1974
- Developmental Dyslexia: a Diagnostic Approach Based on Three Atypical Reading‐spelling PatternsDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1973
- RESEARCH IN READING RETARDATION: TWO CRITICAL PROBLEMS *Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1971
- DEVELOPMENTAL FACTORS IN READING AND WRITING BACKWARDNESSBritish Journal of Psychology, 1963
- Paediatric Aspects of Specific Developmental Dysphasia, Dyslexia and DysgraphiaDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1960