Cryptomonad nuclear and nucleomorph 18S rRNA phylogeny
Open Access
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Phycology
- Vol. 31 (4) , 315-328
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269600651541
Abstract
Nuclear and nucleomorph 18S ribosomal RNA genes from six cryptomonads were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction and sequenced. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by distance, parsimony, and maximum likelihood methods for all available cryptomonad nuclear and nucleomorph 18S rRNA sequences. Nuclear and nucleomorph trees are largely congruent and clearly disprove the idea of polyphyletic origins for cryptomonad chloroplasts. Both show the leucoplast-containing Chilomonas as the sister to all photosynthetic cryptomonads. Using 11 cryptomonad nucleomorph sequences gives more convincing evidence than before that cryptomonad nucleomorphs originated from a red alga and are not specifically related to Chlorarachnion nucleomorphs. Both trees show as a clade the genera with nucleomorphs embedded in a chloroplast-envelope invagination into the pyrenoid (Storeatula, Rhinomonas, Rhodomonas). This monophyly of embedded nucleomorphs supports the recent creation of the order Pyrenomonadales for such cryptomonads. Cryptomonads ancestrally having free nucleomorphs are much more diverse. Komma and Chroomonas, with the blue accessory pigment phycocyanin, form a clade, as do Guillardia and Cryptomonas Φ, both with the red pigment phycoerythrin. The nucleomorph trees strongly show the blue Chroomonas/Komma clade as sister to all red-pigmented genera, but nuclear sequences support this weakly, if at all, being sensitive to taxon sampling. Red and blue cryptomonads probably diverged early by differential pigment loss. Nuclear sequences provide no clear evidence for the nature of the host that engulfed the ancestral symbiont. Our nuclear trees using an extensive selection of outgroups, and recent evidence from chloroplast DNA, are consistent with but do not positively support the view that the closest relatives of Cryptista (i.e. Cryptophyceae plus Goniomonadea) are the Chromobiota (i.e. Haptophyta plus Heterokonta, the latter including heterokont algae—phylum Ochrophyta), and that Cryptista and Chromobiota are appropriately classified as subkingdoms of the kingdom Chromista. Maximum likelihood often groups Goniomonas with Chilomonas, suggesting that Goniomonas may have lost both nucleomorph and plastid and that the cryptist common ancestor was photosynthetic.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oikomonas, a Distinctive Zooflagellate Related to ChrysomonadsArchiv für Protistenkunde, 1996
- A Hidden Markov Model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolutionMolecular Biology and Evolution, 1996
- THE PHYLOGENY OF PLASTIDS: A REVIEW BASED ON COMPARISONS OF SMALL‐SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL RNA CODING REGIONSJournal of Phycology, 1995
- Ribosomal RNA Evidence for Chloroplast Loss within Heterokonta: Pedinellid Relationships and a Revised Classification of Ochristan AlgaeArchiv für Protistenkunde, 1995
- Chimeric conundra: are nucleomorphs and chromists monophyletic or polyphyletic?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1994
- Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phylaMicrobiological Reviews, 1993
- Cryptomonad algae are evolutionary chimaeras of two phylogenetically distinct unicellular eukaryotesNature, 1991
- A eukaryotic genome of 660 kb: electrophoretic karyotype of nucleomorph and cell nucleus of the cryptomonad alga,Pyrenomonas salinaNucleic Acids Research, 1991
- The origins of plastidsBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1982
- Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology, 1978