Pooling Urine Samples for Ligase Chain Reaction Screening for Genital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Asymptomatic Women
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 36 (2) , 481-485
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.2.481-485.1998
Abstract
The accuracy of pooling urine samples for the detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection by ligase chain reaction (LCR) was examined. A model was also developed to determine the number of samples to be pooled for optimal cost savings at various population prevalences. Estimated costs included technician time, laboratory consumables, and assay costs of testing pooled samples and retesting individual specimens from presumptive positive pools. Estimation of population prevalence based on the pooled LCR results was also applied. After individual urine specimens were processed, 568 specimens were pooled by 4 into 142 pools and another 520 specimens were pooled by 10 into 52 pools. For comparison, all 1,088 urine specimens were tested individually. The sample-to-cut-off ratio was lowered from 1.0 to 0.2 for pooled samples, after a pilot study which tested 148 samples pooled by 4 was conducted. The pooling algorithm was 100% (48 of 48) sensitive when samples were pooled by 4 and 98.4% (61 of 62) sensitive when samples were pooled by 10. Although 2.0% (2 of 99) of the negative pools of 4 and 7.1% (1 of 14) of the negative pools of 10 tested presumptive positive, all samples in these presumptive-positive pools were negative when retested individually, making the pooling algorithm 100% specific. In a population with 8% genital C. trachomatis prevalence, pooling by four would reduce costs by 39%. The model demonstrated that with a lower prevalence of 2%, pooling eight samples would reduce costs by 59%. Pooling urine samples for detection of C. trachomatis by LCR is sensitive, specific, and cost saving compared to testing individual samples.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ability of commercial ligase chain reaction and PCR assays to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men by testing first-void urineJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1997
- Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urineThe Lancet, 1995
- Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in individual and pooled endocervical and urethral scrapes by a commercially available polymerase chain reaction.1994
- Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in individual and pooled endocervical and urethral scrapes by a commercially available polymerase chain reactionAPMIS, 1994
- Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assayJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1993
- Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in womenAIDS, 1993
- Comparison of Polymerase Chain Reaction, Monoclonal Antibody Based Enzyme Immunoassay, and Cell Culture for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Genital SpecimensSexually Transmitted Diseases, 1992
- Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in swabs and urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1991
- Cofactors in Male-Female Sexual Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Successful use of pooled sera to determine HIV-1 seroprevalence in Zaire with development of cost-efficiency modelsAIDS, 1990