Comparison of two rapid influenza A/B test kits with reference methods showing high specificity and sensitivity for influenza A infection
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 78 (5) , 619-622
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20584
Abstract
The rapid detection of influenza viruses is important for forming preventative strategies, directing initiation of anti‐viral therapy, detecting potential avian influenza viruses, and excluding influenza‐like pathogens, such as SARS. The ImmunoCard STAT! Flu A and B Plus test (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH) is a new point of care (POC) test utilizing influenza‐specific monoclonal antibodies for rapid diagnosis. The performance of this assay was compared to the established POC Binax NowFlu A and NowFlu B test, and the reference diagnostic standards of viral culture, indirect immunofluorescence (IFA), and RT‐PCR where appropriate. Testing of nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) from children, throat swabs, and nasal swabs from adults indicated ImmunoCard STAT! specificity of 98% and 100% for influenza A and B, respectively in 224 specimens. The Binax test showed specificity of 99% and 100%, respectively for influenza A and B. Sensitivity results were identical for both rapid detection kits (80% and 47% for Flu A and B, respectively). Overall results were very similar for both testing devices with the advantage of ImmunoCard STAT! Flu A and B Plus test detecting influenza A and B with sharp and easy to read results. J. Med. Virol. 78:619–622, 2006.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- When Animal Viruses Attack: SARS and Avian InfluenzaPediatric Annals, 2005
- Comparison of the Directigen Flu A+B Membrane Enzyme Immunoassay with Viral Culture for Rapid Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses in Respiratory SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- New point of care test is highly specific but less sensitive for influenza virus A and B in children and adultsJournal of Medical Virology, 2004
- Comparison of the Directigen Flu A+B Test, the QuickVue Influenza Test, and Clinical Case Definition to Viral Culture and Reverse Transcription-PCR for Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza Virus InfectionJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Comparison of the Denka-Seiken INFLU A·B-Quick and BD Directigen Flu A+B Kits with Direct Fluorescent-Antibody Staining and Shell Vial Culture Methods for Rapid Detection of Influenza VirusesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness among Elderly Nursing Home Residents: A Cohort StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Comparison of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (MDCK) with a green monkey continuous cell line (Vero) and human lung embryonated cells (MRC-5) in the isolation of influenza A virus from nasopharyngeal aspirates by shell vial cultureJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1997
- Application of Directigen FLU-A for the detection of influenza A virus in human and nonhuman specimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1992
- Detection and identification of human influenza viruses by the polymerase chain reactionJournal of Virological Methods, 1991
- Comparison of Directigen FLU-A with viral isolation and direct immunofluorescence for the rapid detection and identification of influenza A virusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1991