Offering a Job: Meritocracy and Social Networks
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in American Journal of Sociology
- Vol. 106 (3) , 763-816
- https://doi.org/10.1086/318961
Abstract
This study focuses on the impact of sex, race, and social networks, to analyze the hiring process in a midsized high‐technology organization, using information on all 35,229 applicants in a 10‐year period (1985–94). For gender, the process is entirely meritocratic: age and education account for all sex differences. But even without taking into account the two meritocratic variables, there are small if no differences between men and women at all stages in the hiring process. For ethnic minorities, the process is partly meritocratic but partly reliant upon social networks. Once referral method is taken into account, all race effects disappear. In hiring, ethnic minorities are thus disadvantaged in the processes that take place before the organization is contacted. They lack access to or utilize less well the social networks that lead to high success in getting hired.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Friends in High Places: The Effects of Social Networks on Discrimination in Salary NegotiationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2000
- Detecting DiscriminationJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1998
- Sifting and Sorting: Personal Contacts and Hiring in a Retail BankAmerican Sociological Review, 1997
- Gender, Children, and Social Contact: The Effects of Childrearing for Men and WomenAmerican Sociological Review, 1997
- Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage GapAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1995
- Selection Methods in US EstablishmentsActa Sociologica, 1994
- The Hiring ProcessAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1994
- Job Search and the Occupational Segregation of WomenAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 1991
- The Changing Nature of Employment Discrimination LitigationStanford Law Review, 1991
- A Comment on Presenting Results from Logit and Probit ModelsAmerican Sociological Review, 1985