Assessment of early virological response to antiviral therapy by comparing four assays for HCV RNA quantitation using the international unit standard: Implications for clinical management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
WHO International Standards for nucleic acid tests are used widely to compare the different assays used in HCV RNA quantitation. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the international unit standard for measuring HCV RNA in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Twenty‐seven naïve patients infected chronically by HCV were treated with ribavirin plus PEG‐interferon‐alfa‐2b for 48 weeks. SVR was obtained for 16 patients (the other were non‐responders). For HCV RNA quantitation, four assays were undertaken: Versant HCV RNA 3.0 (Bayer), Real time PCR (TaqMan, Roche), LCx HCV RNA (Abbott), and Cobas Amplicor‐Monitor v2 (Roche). Considering a 2‐log decline at Week 12 after the beginning of therapy, discordant results were found with the four HCV RNA methods in predicting SVR or non‐response. At Week 4 and Week 12, significant differences were observed between Versant HCV RNA 3.0 versus PCR HCV Taqman, Versant HCV RNA 3.0 versus LCx HCV RNA, Cobas Monitor Amplicor HCV 2.0 versus LCx HCV RNA, and Cobas Monitor Amplicor HCV 2.0 versus PCR HCV Taqman (P < 0.001). The HCV RNA cutoff, given a 100% negative predictive value at Week 4 and Week 12, differed with the assays used to quantify HCV RNA, despite the use of the IU/ml units. Eighty‐nine percent of serum values for HCV RNA were concordant by the IU standard. All assays, however, failed to detect HCV RNA in some cases. Despite the use of the IU standard HCV‐infected patients might be monitored with only one assay. J. Med. Virol. 78:208–215, 2006.