A Preventive Approach to Obstetric Care in a Rural Hospital: Association Between Higher Rates of Preventive Labor Induction and Lower Rates of Cesarean Delivery
- 1 July 2007
- journal article
- Published by Annals of Family Medicine in Annals of Family Medicine
- Vol. 5 (4) , 310-319
- https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.706
Abstract
Annual cesarean delivery rates in North America are increasing. Despite the morbidity associated with cesarean delivery, a safe preventive strategy to reduce the use of this procedure has not been forthcoming. During the 1990s, clinicians in a rural hospital developed a method of care involving prostaglandin-assisted preventive labor induction. An inverse relationship was noted between yearly hospital rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery. The purpose of our study was to compare cesarean delivery rates between practitioners who often used preventive induction and practitioners who did not, while controlling for patient mix and differences in practice style. Between 1993 and 1997, different hospital practitioners used risk-guided prostaglandin-assisted preventive labor induction with differing intensity. We used a retrospective cohort design, based on the practitioner providing prenatal care, to compare birth outcomes in women exposed to this alternative method of care with those in women not exposed. Multiple logistic regression analysis controlled for patient characteristics and clustering by practitioner. The exposed group (n = 794), as compared with the nonexposed group (n = 1,075), had a higher labor induction rate (31.4% vs 20.4%, P <.001), a greater use of prostaglandin E2 (23.3% vs 15.7%, P <.001), and a lower cesarean delivery rate (5.3% vs 11.8%, P <.001). Adjustment for cluster effects, patient characteristics, and the use of epidural analgesia did not eliminate the significant association between exposure to this preventive method of care and a lower cesarean delivery rate. Rates of other adverse birth outcomes were either unchanged or reduced in the exposed group. A preventive approach to reducing cesarean deliveries may be possible. This study found that practitioners who often used risk-guided, prostaglandin-assisted labor induction had a lower cesarean delivery rate without increases in rates of other adverse birth outcomes. Randomized controlled trials of this method of care are warranted.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Active management of risk in pregnancy at term in an urban population: An association between a higher induction of labor rate and a lower cesarean delivery rateAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Elective induction of labor: Should we make a fuss?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- The Downside of Cesarean Delivery: Short- and Long-Term ComplicationsClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Indicated labor induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 increases the risk of cesarean section even in multiparous women with no previous cesarean sectionjpme, 2004
- Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous womenObstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductionsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- The effects of mifepristone on cervical ripening and labor induction in primigravidaeObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Impact of Risk-Adjusting Cesarean Delivery Rates When Reporting Hospital PerformanceJAMA, 1998
- Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean deliveryPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION1964