Indicated labor induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 increases the risk of cesarean section even in multiparous women with no previous cesarean section
- 6 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in jpme
- Vol. 32 (1) , 31-36
- https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2004.005
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the impact of induction of labor with vaginal tablets of prostaglandin E2 on the rate of cesarean section (CS), and to identify possible predictors of successful vaginal delivery. Methods: 1541 consecutive women admitted for induction of labor with vaginal tablets of PGE2 were retrospectively compared with 574 consecutive women with spontaneous onset of labor. Results: Maternal age, nulliparity, previous CS, gestational age, and birth weight were similar in the study and control groups. The CS rate was twofold higher in the study group (20.7% vs 10.6%). CS rates in the study and control groups were 26.9% and 12.8% for the nulliparous women, and 11.2% and 5.1% for the multiparous women with no previous CS. Neither group had major maternal or fetal complications. A logistic regression model and stepwise analysis showed that nulliparity, previous CS, maternal age, number of PGE2 applications, birth weight, and the induction of labor by itself were independent significant risk factors for increased CS rate. Conclusions: Induction of labor with vaginal PGE2 tablets results in a vaginal delivery rate of 79.3%, with apparently no serious maternal or fetal complications. Nulliparity, and previous CS are the most significant risk factors for increased CS rate. However, even after these risk factors are excluded and controlling for possible predictors for CS, PGE2 induction is independently associated with a twofold increase in CS rate, most often because of labor dystocia.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: A matched cohort studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous womenObstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductionsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Elective Induction Versus Spontaneous Labor: A Case-Control Analysis of Safety and EfficacyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- High risk pregnancy outcome following induction of labourEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1997
- Outcomes of Induced LabourAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Labour induction policy in hospitals of different levels of specialisationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: A retrospective study of complications and outcomeAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- Hazards and benefits of elective induction of laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984