Choice and instrumental delivery
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 103 (7) , 608-611
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09825.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- An analysis of recent trends in vacuum extraction and forceps delivery in the United KingdomBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Not quite as random as I pretendedThe Lancet, 1996
- Labour and delivery of ‘normal’ primiparous women: analysis of routinely collected dataBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995
- A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Health after assisted vaginal delivery: Follow up of a random controlled studyJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- The pliable obstetrical vacuum cup: application and opinions in The NetherlandsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1992
- Maternal impressions of forceps or the Silc‐cupBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- The obstetric vacuum extractor is the instrument of first choice for operative vaginal deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983