Group Influence versus Decision-Making Rules
- 1 March 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 19 (3) , 373-394
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168401900307
Abstract
Using data from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this analysis compares the impact of decision-making rules (embodying citywide funding priorities) on Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocational decisions with the impact of support exerted on behalf of neighborhood-specific priorities. It is found that in addition to the amount of funding requested and the constraints imposed by ongoing projects, both the city's funding guidelines (a decision-making rule) and influence on behalf of neighborhood concerns that is channeled through neighborhood advisory councils have an impact on allocational decisions. Rules constrain the decision-making process: if political pressure on behalf of neighborhood concerns exists, it must be built into the process and procedures must be created that allow group input.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Race, Politics and Elites: Testing Alternative Models of Municipal Service DistributionAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1981
- Citizen Demands and Urban Services: The Distribution of Bureaucratic Response in Chicago and HoustonAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1981
- Party and Bureaucracy: The Influence of Intermediary Groups on Urban Public Service DeliveryAmerican Political Science Review, 1981
- Planning Under New Federalism Coping with Conflicting RolesJournal of the American Planning Association, 1981