An integrated system for planning, navigation and robotic assistance for skull base surgery
- 22 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
- Vol. 4 (4) , 321-330
- https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.213
Abstract
Background: We developed an image‐guided robot system to provide mechanical assistance for skull base drilling, which is performed to gain access for some neurosurgical interventions, such as tumour resection. The motivation for introducing this robot was to improve safety by preventing the surgeon from accidentally damaging critical neurovascular structures during the drilling procedure.Methods: We integrated a Stealthstation®navigation system, a NeuroMate®robotic arm with a six‐degree‐of‐freedom force sensor, and the 3D Slicer visualization software to allow the robotic arm to be used in a navigated, cooperatively‐controlled fashion by the surgeon. We employed virtual fixtures to constrain the motion of the robot‐held cutting tool, so that it remained in the safe zone that was defined on a preoperative CT scan.Results: We performed experiments on both foam skull and cadaver heads. The results for foam blocks cut using different registrations yielded an average placement error of 0.6 mm and an average dimensional error of 0.6 mm. We drilled the posterior porus acusticus in three cadaver heads and concluded that the robot‐assisted procedure is clinically feasible and provides some ergonomic benefits, such as stabilizing the drill. We obtained postoperative CT scans of the cadaver heads to assess the accuracy and found that some bone outside the virtual fixture boundary was cut. The typical overcut was 1–2 mm, with a maximum overcut of about 3 mm.Conclusions: The image‐guided cooperatively‐controlled robot system can improve the safety and ergonomics of skull base drilling by stabilizing the drill and enforcing virtual fixtures to protect critical neurovascular structures. The next step is to improve the accuracy so that the overcut can be reduced to a more clinically acceptable value of about 1 mm. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
Funding Information
- NSF (9731748)
- NIH (U41 RR019703, P41 RR13218 and U54 EB005419)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of various surgical methods in the treatment of implant-related infectionInternational Orthopaedics, 2009
- Robot-assisted skull base surgeryPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2007
- Navigated control in functional endoscopic sinus surgeryInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2005
- An Automated Robotic Approach with Redundant Navigation for Minimal Invasive Extended Transsphenoidal Skull Base Surgerymin - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, 2005
- Today's state of the art in surgical roboticsComputer Aided Surgery, 2005
- The hands-on orthopaedic robot "acrobot": early clinical trials of total knee replacement surgeryIEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2003
- Development of the First Force‐Controlled Robot for OtoneurosurgeryThe Laryngoscope, 2003
- The application accuracy of the NeuroMate robot?A quantitative comparison with frameless and frame-based surgical localization systemsComputer Aided Surgery, 2002
- Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markersIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1997
- Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patternsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,1991