Comparison of outcomes (early and six- month) of direct stenting with conventional stenting (a meta-analysis of ten randomized trials)

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:

• Could direct stenting reduce no-reflow in acute coronary syndromes? A randomized pilot study
  American Heart Journal, 2002
• Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: immediate and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The DISCO trial
  European Heart Journal, 2002
• Comparison of direct stenting versus stenting with predilation for the treatment of selected coronary narrowings
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 2002
• A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
• Comparison of PRE-dilatation vs Direct stenting In Coronary Treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial)
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
• A randomized trial of stenting with or without balloon predilation for the treatment of coronary artery disease
  American Heart Journal, 2001
• Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients
  Heart, 2001
• Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in patients with stable angina pectoris
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
• A randomized study of direct coronary stent delivery compared with stenting after predilatation: The NIR future trial
  Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2000
• Stent implantation without predilation in patients with a single, noncalcified coronary artery lesion
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1999