Clinical Evaluation of the Safety of Repetitive Intraoperative Defibrillation Threshold Testing
- 30 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 15 (6) , 870-877
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03077.x
Abstract
One goal of the initial implantation procedure for a cardioverter defibrillator is determination of the configuration and patch location with the lowest defibrillation threshold (DFT). To determine the safety of multiple defibrillation tests, an analysis of the intraoperative defibrillation threshold tests (DFTT) in our patients was performed. In 84 patients, the mean number of DFT trials was 5.27; the mean number of joules received was 275.0. The maximum number of shocks in one implant procedure was 50 for a total of 4,895 joules without complications. Four patients received 30 or more DFT shocks without complication. There were two complications related directly to the DFTT: one patient with severe noninflammatory cardiomyopathy developed electromechanical dissociation and was subsequently resuscitated and survived; the second patient with severe triple vessel coronary artery disease suffered an intraoperative myocardial infarction during testing and eventually died 22 days postoperatively. All patients received an ICD unit; six patients had DFTs of > 20 joules. Based on our experience, we followed the clinical status (heart rate, blood pressure, EGG changes, fluid status, total anesthesia time) during the DFTT to determine the extent and duration of our testing protocol. Multiple shocks due to repositioning of the leads in a stable patient should not prohibit extensive testing as adverse consequences do not appear to be cumulative.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defibrillation Threshold Testing and Other Practices Related to AICD Implantation: Do All Roads Lead to Rome?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- The defibrillation threshold: How many measurements are enough?American Heart Journal, 1989
- Defibrillation threshold testing: Necessary but evil?American Heart Journal, 1989
- Effects of Time to Defibrillation and Subthreshold Preshocks on Defibrillation Success in PigsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- Lessons learned from the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Past, present and futureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Defibrillation Threshold: A Simple and Quantitative Estimate of the Ability to DefibrillatePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1987
- Double and triple sequential shocks reduce ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs with and without myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1986
- Defibrillation with the sequential pulse technique: Reproducibility with repeated shocksAmerican Heart Journal, 1986
- The implanted defibrillator: relation of defibrillating lead configuration and clinical variables to defibrillation thresholdJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- Practical aspects of automatic cardioverter/defibrillator implantationAmerican Heart Journal, 1984