Distribution of urethane and its binding to dna, rna, and protein in sencar and balb/c mice following oral and dermal administration
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health
- Vol. 15 (5) , 635-654
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15287398509530692
Abstract
Urethane produces threefold more skin papillomas when administered orally than dermally in SENCAR mice, a strain susceptible to tumorigenesis. To better understand the relation of distribution to the initiation stage, [14C]urethane (0.10 mg/kg, 2.5 .mu.Ci/25 g) was administered orally and dermally to male SENCAR and BALB/c mice. Absorption of urethane was greater in the first hour in SENCAR mice by both routes, as indicated by more label in the liver, lung, and stomach than found in these tissues in BALB/c mice. These differences were not observed at later time periods after oral administration. Following dermal application, higher levels were maintained in the liver, lungs, and stomach through 48 h in the SENCAR mice when compared to BALB/c mice. Binding of [14C]urethane (0.062 mg/g body weight, 20 .mu.Ci/20 g body weight) to DNA, RNA, and protein 6 h after oral administration varied with tissue (liver > stomach > skin = lung) but did not differ with strain. Binding to DNA in skin, lung, and stomach, RNA in stomach, and protein in stomach and liver after 48 h were significantly higher in SENCAR mice than in BALB/c mice. Dermal application of [14C]urethane resulted in severalfold higher binding to liver DNA of SENCAR mice than BALB/c mice, but DNA binding was comparable in other tissues after 6 h. At 48 h after dermal application, significantly higher levels of [14C]urethane remained bound to skin DNA, RNA, and protein in BALB/c mice, although all values were lower than at 6 h after treatment. Differences in the distribution and binding of urethane probably do not account for the discrepancies in tumor sensitivity. Liver DNA hydrolysates were examined after 48 h. Thin-layer chromatography showed little incorporation of the 14C into the normal deoxyribonucleotide or deoxyribonucleotide bases, and no modified bases were apparent. Radioactivity was present in the fraction that remained at the origin and was consistent with a dinucleotide fragment resistant to phosphodiesterase cleavage, such as a phosphotriester.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Labeled 1,N6-ethenoadenosine and 3,N4-ethenocytidine in hepatic RNA of mice given [ethyl-1,2-3H or ethyl-1-14C] ethyl carbamate (urethan)Carcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1982
- Studies on the Mechanisms Involved in Multistage Carcinogenesis in Mouse SkinJournal of Cellular Biochemistry, 1982
- Comparison of the tumor-initiating activity of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene and benzo[a]pyrene in female SENCAR and CD-1 miceCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1980
- Effects of urethane administration on the sedimentation patterns of mouse and rat liver DNA in alkaline sucrose gradientsChemico-Biological Interactions, 1978
- The binding of ethyl carbamate to DNA of mouse liver in vivo: The nature of the bound molecule and the site of bindingChemico-Biological Interactions, 1976
- The interaction of carbon-14-labelled alkyl carbamates, labelled in the alkyl and carbonyl positions, with DNA in vivoChemico-Biological Interactions, 1973
- The reaction of urethane with mouse liver nucleic acids in vivoPathology, 1971
- Variation of Antigenic Characteristics Between Different Mouse Lymphomas Induced by the Moloney Virus2JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1966
- Delayed Effect of Genetic Segregation on the Transmission of the Mammary-Tumor Agent in MiceJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1960
- The distribution of urethane in animal tissues, as determined by a microdiffusion method, and the effect of urethane treatment on enzymesBiochemical Journal, 1949