Efficacy and Safety of Ephedra and Ephedrine for Weight Loss and Athletic Performance
Top Cited Papers
- 26 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 289 (12) , 1537-45
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.12.1537
Abstract
Ephedra and ephedrine sometimes are used for weight loss or enhanced athletic performance, but the efficacy and safety of these compounds are uncertain. To assess the efficacy and safety of ephedra and ephedrine used for weight loss and enhanced athletic performance. We searched 9 databases using the terms ephedra, ephedrine, adverse effect, side effect, efficacy, effective, and toxic. We included unpublished trials and non-English-language documents. Adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration MedWatch program were assessed. Eligible studies were controlled trials of ephedra or ephedrine used for weight loss or athletic performance and case reports of adverse events associated with such use. Eligible studies for weight loss were human studies with at least 8 weeks of follow-up; and for athletic performance, those having no minimum follow-up. Eligible case reports documented that ephedra or ephedrine was consumed within 24 hours prior to an adverse event or that ephedrine or an associated product was found in blood or urine, and that other potential causes had been excluded. Of the 530 articles screened, 52 controlled trials and 65 case reports were included in the adverse events analysis. Of more than 18 000 other case reports screened, 284 underwent detailed review. Two reviewers independently identified trials of efficacy and safety of ephedra and ephedrine on weight loss or athletic performance; disagreements were resolved by consensus. Case reports were reviewed with explicit and implicit methods. No weight loss trials assessed duration of treatment greater than 6 months. Pooled results for trials comparing placebo with ephedrine (n = 5), ephedrine and caffeine (n = 12), ephedra (n = 1), and ephedra and herbs containing caffeine (n = 4) yielded estimates of weight loss (more than placebo) of 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.0), 1.0 (0.7-1.3), 0.8 (0.4-1.2), and 1.0 (0.6-1.3) kg/mo, respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not substantially alter the latter 3 results. No trials of ephedra and athletic performance were found; 7 trials of ephedrine were too heterogeneous to synthesize. Safety data from 50 trials yielded estimates of 2.2- to 3.6-fold increases in odds of psychiatric, autonomic, or gastrointestinal symptoms, and heart palpitations. Data are insufficient to draw conclusions about adverse events occurring at a rate less than 1.0 per thousand. The majority of case reports are insufficiently documented to allow meaningful assessment. Ephedrine and ephedra promote modest short-term weight loss (approximately 0.9 kg/mo more than placebo) in clinical trials. There are no data regarding long-term weight loss, and evidence to support use of ephedra for athletic performance is insufficient. Use of ephedra or ephedrine and caffeine is associated with increased risk of psychiatric, autonomic, or gastrointestinal symptoms, and heart palpitations.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Herbal ephedra/caffeine for weight loss: a 6-month randomized safety and efficacy trialInternational Journal of Obesity, 2002
- The effects of orlistat on weight and on serum lipids in obese patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre studyInternational Journal of Obesity, 2001
- An herbal supplement containing Ma Huang-Guarana for weight loss: a randomized, double-blind trialInternational Journal of Obesity, 2001
- Effect of orlistat treatment on body composition and resting energy expenditure during a two-year weight-reduction programme in obese FinnsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Activity related energy expenditure in children and adolescents with Prader–Willi syndromeInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Evaluation of Drugs for Treating ObesityObesity Research, 1995
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Comparison of continuous and intermittent anorectic therapy in obesity.BMJ, 1968