You're Never Too Old
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 328 (13) , 971-975
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199304013281319
Abstract
The Clinical Problem-Solving article “Too Old for What?” elsewhere in this issue1 describes an 87-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis, three-vessel coronary artery disease, depressed left ventricular function, and moderately severe heart failure. Once the diagnosis of aortic stenosis was made, neither the patient's physicians nor the discussant considered nonsurgical therapy, but in an accompanying note the editor wonders whether the discussion, which strongly favors surgery, might be too one-sided. Might the risks of surgery outweigh the expected benefit of symptomatic improvement? Should the possibility of improved life expectancy have a role in such decisions? How should the potential for . . .Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- The natural history of aortic stenosis in adultsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Evaluation of restenosis after balloon dilatation in adult aortic stenosis by repeat catheterizationAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Cerebrovascular disease and functional outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery.Stroke, 1989
- Aortic Valvuloplasty — A Valid Alternative?New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Open-Heart Surgery in OctogenariansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Changing Aspects of the Natural History of Valvular Aortic StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Benefit and Cost Analysis in Geriatric CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival.Circulation, 1982
- The Toss-upNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978