Does IVIM measure classical perfusion?
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 16 (3) , 470-475
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910160313
Abstract
MR measurements based on motion encoding gradients provide interesting information about diffusion in tissues and have also been advanced as a way to measure tissue perfusion. This communication shows why IVIM cannot measure perfusion in the classical sense. Attempts to do so result from an unclear understanding of classical perfusion measurements and from confusion between terminal deposition (or uptake) and blood volume flow. © 1990 Academic Press, Inc.Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute of Canada
- General Electric Medical Systems of Canada
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system.Radiology, 1990
- Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.Radiology, 1988
- Deuterium nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of blood flow and tissue perfusion employing 2H2O as a freely diffusible tracer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1987
- MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.Radiology, 1986
- The interpretation of mean transit time measurements for multiphase tissue systemsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1973
- Equations for Measuring Blood Flow by External Monitoring of RadioisotopesCirculation Research, 1965
- MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD-FLOW THROUGH SKELETAL MUSCLE BY INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTION OF XENON-133The Lancet, 1964
- On the Theory of the Indicator-Dilution Method for Measurement of Blood Flow and VolumeJournal of Applied Physiology, 1954
- Measurement of regional circulation by the local clearance of radioactive sodiumAmerican Heart Journal, 1949