Economic Evaluation of an Intensive Group Training Protocol Compared With Usual Care Physiotherapy in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 33 (4) , 445-451
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318163fa59
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN. Economic evaluation from a societal perspective conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial with a follow-up of 52 weeks. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the cost effectiveness and cost utility of an intensive group training protocol compared with usual care physiotherapy in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. The intensive group training protocol combines exercise therapy, back school, and behavioral principles. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Two studies found a significant reduction in absenteeism for a graded activity program in occupational health care. This program has not yet been evaluated in a primary care physiotherapy setting. METHODS. Participating physical therapists in primary care recruited 114 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eligible patients were randomized to either the protocol group or the guideline group. Outcome measures included functional status (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), pain intensity (11-point numerical rating scale), general perceived effect and quality of life (EuroQol-5D). Cost data were measured with cost diaries and included direct and indirect costs related to low back pain. RESULTS. After 52 weeks, the direct health care costs were significantly higher for patients in the protocol group, largely due to the costs of the intervention. The mean difference in total costs amounted to € 233 (95% confidence interval: € -2.185; € 2.764). The cost-effectiveness planes indicated no significant differences in cost effectiveness between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION. The results of this economic evaluation showed no difference in total costs between the protocol group and the guideline group. The differences in effects were small and not statistically significant. At present, national implementation of the protocol is not recommended. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, IncKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effectiveness of High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Back Schools in an Occupational SettingSpine, 2006
- Meta-Analysis: Exercise Therapy for Nonspecific Low Back PainAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2005
- The economic cost of low back pain in sweden in 2001Acta Orthopaedica, 2005
- United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary careBMJ, 2004
- The economic burden of back pain in the UKPAIN®, 2000
- Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferencesBMJ, 1999
- Health economic assessment of behavioural rehabilitation in chronic low back pain: a randomised clinical trialHealth Economics, 1998
- A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The NetherlandsPain, 1995
- The Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain — Bed Rest, Exercises, or Ordinary Activity?New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The Effect of Graded Activity on Patients with Subacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study with an Operant-Conditioning Behavioral ApproachPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1992