Series on the Quality of Health Care
- 13 March 1997
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 336 (11) , 804-807
- https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199703133361113
Abstract
In “Quality of Care — What Is It?” (Sept. 19 issue),1 the first article in the series on the quality of health care, Blumenthal asks the wrong question. He should have asked, “Who should be the judge?” Blumenthal discusses how the experts and central planners try to determine what is good health care. This top-down method will not work. Choices about quality in medicine are no different from choices about quality in other areas of life, such as purchasing an automobile. Would we turn over to auto makers the task of deciding which car is best for us? Of course not. Yet this is what we have done in medicine. This simplistic notion puts managed-care companies in charge of choosing quality.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling Mortality Rates for Elderly Heart Attack Patients: Profiling Hospitals in the Cooperative Cardiovascular ProjectPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- The Role of Physicians in the Future of Quality ManagementNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Payment by Capitation and the Quality of CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Origins of the Quality-of-Care DebateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes StudyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Measuring Quality of CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Quality of Care — What is It?New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Randomised comparison of guided self management and traditional treatment of asthma over one yearBMJ, 1996
- Health Care Reform Is on the Way: Do We Want To Compete on Quality?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1994