The Origins of the Quality-of-Care Debate
- 10 October 1996
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 335 (15) , 1146-1149
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199610103351511
Abstract
The current concern about quality of care in the United States is deeply paradoxical in many ways. From a technical and scientific standpoint, the capabilities of the nation's health care system are extraordinary. Decades of biomedical research have culminated in new forms of technology that have greatly improved the health of Americans. Two examples (benefiting very different demographic groups) are neonatal intensive care units and new inpatient treatments for coronary artery disease. Neonatal intensive care units account for a substantial portion of the recent decline in neonatal and infant mortality rates in the United States.1 Improvements in the inpatient care . . .Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the Quality of CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Medically Uninsured — Will They Always Be with Us?New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Recent Trends in Acute Coronary Heart Disease — Mortality, Morbidity, Medical Care, and Risk FactorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Challenges Posed by Managed Behavioral Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Vertical Integration and Organizational Networks in Health CareHealth Affairs, 1996
- A National Survey of the Arrangements Managed-Care Plans Make with PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The Quality of Care and the Quality of Measuring ItNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Gatekeeping Revisited — Protecting Patients from OvertreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Physician-Payment Reform — Unfinished BusinessNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Financial Incentives for Physicians in HMOsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987