Heart failure in patients with preserved and deteriorated left ventricular ejection fraction
Open Access
- 1 April 2005
- Vol. 91 (4) , 489-494
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.031922
Abstract
Objectives: To determine clinical and prognostic differences between preserved and deteriorated systolic function (defined as left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions ⩾ 50% and < 50%, respectively) in patients with heart failure satisfying modified Framingham criteria. Patients and methods: Records were studied of 1252 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) (mean (SD) age 69.4 (11.7) years; 485 women, 767 men) who had been admitted to a cardiology service for CHF in the period 1991–2002 and whose LV systolic function had been echocardiographically evaluated within two weeks of admission. Data were collected on the main clinical findings, supplementary examinations, treatment, and duration of hospitalisation. Whether the patient was alive in the spring of 2003 was evaluated by searching the general archives of the hospital and by telephone survey. Results: LV systolic function was preserved in 39.8% of patients. Age, female to male sex ratio, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation, valve disease, and other non-ischaemic, non-dilated cardiopathies were all significantly greater in the group with preserved systolic function. New York Heart Association functional class IV, third heart sound, jugular vein congestion, cardiomegaly, radiological signs of lung oedema, pathological Q waves, left bundle branch block, sinus rhythm, ischaemic cardiopathy, and dilated cardiomyopathy were all significantly more prevalent in the group with deteriorated systolic function, as was treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and most other antihypertensive drugs on discharge from hospital. There was no significant difference in survival between the groups with preserved and deteriorated systolic function (either survival regardless of age at admission or in subgroups aged < 75 and ⩾ 75 years at admission). In the whole group, survival rates after one, three, and five years were 84.0%, 66.7%, and 50.9%, respectively. Conclusion: In view of the poor prognosis of patients with CHF with preserved LV systolic function, who are currently treated empirically, it is to be hoped that relevant controlled clinical trials under way will afford information allowing optimisation of their treatment.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognosis for patients newly admitted to hospital with heart failure: survival trends in 12 220 index admissions in Leicestershire 1993-2001Heart, 2003
- Predicting mortality in patients with heart failure: a pragmatic approachHeart, 2003
- 2003 European Society of Hypertension???European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension*Journal Of Hypertension, 2003
- Long-term survival in patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure: relation to preserved and reduced left ventricular systolic functionEuropean Heart Journal, 2003
- Heart failure after myocardial infarction: Prevalence of preserved left ventricular systolic function in the communityAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- A Randomized Trial of the Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Valsartan in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failureEuropean Heart Journal, 2001
- THE ROLE OF HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE IN CARDIAC DISEASES IN SPAIN. THE CARDIOTENS STUDY 1999Revista Espanola de Cardiologia, 2001
- Prevalence, clinical features and prognosis of diastolic heart failure: An epidemiologic perspectiveJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Long-term outcome in patients with congestive heart failure and intact systolic left ventricular performanceThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992