Improved Diagnostic Evaluation of Suspected Tuberculosis
- 4 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 148 (5) , 325-336
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00003
Abstract
The role of new T-cell–based blood tests for tuberculosis in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis is unclear. To compare the performance of 2 interferon-γ assays and tuberculin skin testing in adults with suspected tuberculosis. Prospective study conducted in routine practice. 2 urban hospitals in the United Kingdom. 389 adults, predominantly of South Asian and black ethnicity, with moderate to high clinical suspicion of active tuberculosis. Tuberculin skin testing, the enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) incorporating early secretory antigenic target-6 and culture filtrate protein-10 (standard ELISpot), and ELISpot incorporating a novel antigen, Rv3879c (ELISpotPLUS) were performed during diagnostic assessment by independent persons who were blinded to results of the other test. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios. 194 patients had a final diagnosis of active tuberculosis, of which 79% were culture-confirmed. Sensitivity for culture confirmed and highly probable tuberculosis was 89% (95% CI, 84% to 93%) with ELISpotPLUS, 85% (CI, 79% to 90%) with standard ELISpot, 79% (CI, 72% to 85%) with 15-mm threshold tuberculin skin testing, and 83% (CI, 77% to 89%) with stratified thresholds of 15 and 10 mm in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, respectively. The ELISpotPLUS assay was more sensitive than tuberculin skin testing with 15-mm cutoff points (P = 0.01) but not with stratified cutoff points (P = 0.10). The ELISpotPLUS assay had 4% higher diagnostic sensitivity than standard ELISpot (P = 0.02). Combined sensitivity of ELISpotPLUS and tuberculin skin testing was 99% (CI, 95% to 100%), conferring a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (CI, 0 to 0.06) when both test results were negative. Local standards for tuberculin skin testing differed from others used internationally. The study sample included few immunosuppressed patients. The ELISpotPLUS assay is more sensitive than standard ELISpot and, when used in combination with tuberculin skin testing, enables rapid exclusion of active infection in patients with moderate to high pretest probability of tuberculosis.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of two commercial interferon-γ assays for diagnosingMycobacterium tuberculosisinfectionEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2006
- Repeated tuberculin testing does not induce false positive ELISPOT resultsThorax, 2006
- Sensitivity of a new commercial enzyme-linked immunospot assay (T SPOT-TB) for diagnosis of tuberculosis in clinical practiceEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic reviewThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Evaluation of T-Cell Responses to Novel RD1- and RD2-EncodedMycobacterium tuberculosisGene Products for Specific Detection of Human Tuberculosis InfectionInfection and Immunity, 2004
- Tuberculosis at the end of the 20th century in England and Wales: results of a national survey in 1998Thorax, 2001
- Enumeration of T Cells Specific for RD1‐Encoded Antigens Suggests a High Prevalence of LatentMycobacterium tuberculosisInfection in Healthy Urban IndiansThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1994
- The Tuberculin Skin TestClinical Infectious Diseases, 1993
- Application of Logistic Regression to the Analysis of Diagnostic DataMedical Decision Making, 1992