On the beam quality specification of high‐energy photons for radiotherapy dosimetry

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
An overview of common photon beam quality specifiers used in radiotherapy dosimetry introduces a reasoned discussion on the advantages and disadvantages ofandIt is shown that some of the potential advantages ofare also present in other well known beam quality specifiers such asHowever, all PDD‐based beam quality indices, includingare subject to electron contamination and their determination is affected by practical limitations. The proposed filtration of contaminant electrons by Kosunen and Rogers [Med. Phys.20, 1181–1188 (1993)] and by Li and Rogers [Med. Phys.21, 791–798 (1994)] is questioned, not only with regard to the adequacy of using lead as an electron filter, but also in relation to its efficiency (ifthere were no contamination, restrictions for beam calibrations atwould be removed) and practical measurement. It is argued that (i) there is no unique beam quality specifier that works satisfactorily in all possible conditions, for the entire energy range of photon energies used in radiotherapy and all possible accelerators used in hospitals and in standards laboratories, and (ii)remains to be the most appropriate specifier for clinical photon beams as it has less practical drawbacks than PDD‐based quality indices. The final impact on clinical photon beam dosimetry resulting from the use of different photon beam quality specifiers, is that they are not expected to yield a significant change (i.e., more than 0.5% and in most cases well within 0.2%) in the absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for most clinical beams.