A critical survey of fresh‐frozen plasma use
- 12 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 26 (6) , 511-513
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1986.26687043615.x
Abstract
The use of 534 units of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) during 160 transfusion episodes in 135 consecutive patients was reviewed. Only 27 percent of transfusions were indicated by a need for replacement of labile coagulation factors. Other uses included volume repletion (31%), intraoperative bleeding or massive transfusion without coagulopathy (19%), and miscellaneous indications unrelated to labile coagulation factors (23%). Data from other institutions and national sources support the hypothesis that much of the increase in FFP use over the last decade is related to decreases in whole blood availability rather than to use for labile coagulation factor replacement. The use of FFP and red cells as a substitute for, or in preference to, whole blood may have significant adverse implications in terms of the cost and safety of blood transfusions.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inappropriate use of fresh-frozen plasmaPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1985
- Fresh-Frozen PlasmaPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1985
- Hemostasis Testing during Massive Blood Replacement A Study of 172 CasesVox Sanguinis, 1982
- Controlled study of treatment for disseminated intravascular coagulation in the neonateThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1982
- Whole Blood Versus Packed-cell TransfusionsAnnals of Surgery, 1981
- Use of plasma products with whole blood and packed RBCsJAMA, 1979
- Hemostasis in Massively Transfused Trauma PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1979
- Red Cells for TransfusionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Which is the Factual Basis, in Theory and Clinical Practice, for the Use of Fresh Frozen Plasma?Vox Sanguinis, 1978