Records, recall loss, and recall bias in pregnancy: a comparison of interview and medical records data of pregnant and postnatal women.
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 79 (1) , 78-80
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.79.1.78
Abstract
To determine the agreement between interview-based and medical records data concerning illnesses and medications early in pregnancy, we compared the interviews of 202 women with the ongoing records collected during their pregnancies. Substantial underrecording of most transient illnesses was found. Fewer short-term illnesses were reported by postpartum women than sill-pregnant women, suggesting the potential for recall bias or loss.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Measurement of Interrater AgreementPublished by Wiley ,2003
- CHILDBIRTH RESEARCH DATA: MEDICAL RECORDS OR WOMEN'S REPORTS?1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- A COMPARISON OF PREGNANCY HISTORY RECALL AND MEDICAL RECORDSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Recall `Error' in Interview Studies of Past Durg UseAmerican Journal of Public Health, 1982
- Prospective versus retrospective approach in the search for environmental causes of malformations.American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1967