Abstract
This article mentions some of the problems associated with the criteria of reproducibility and scalability as they are commonly used in Guttman scalogram analysis to evaluate cumulative, non-parametric scales of dichotomous items. It then describes the advantages of criteria developed by Loevinger (1948) and Mokken (1971) to evaluate such scales. A short SAS computer program is presented which analyzes response patterns elicited by dichotomous scales designed to be cumulative. The program computes Loevinger's H as index of the scalability (cumulativeness) of a set of items as well as Mokken's Hi for each item indicating the degree of scalability of each item with respect to the other items of a given scale.