Relations Before States:
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in European Journal of International Relations
- Vol. 5 (3) , 291-332
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005003002
Abstract
In recent years, paradigmatic debates in International Relations (IR) have focused on questions of epistemology and methodology. While important in their own right, these differences have obscured the basic divide in the discipline between substantialism, which takes entities as primitives, and relationalism, which takes processes of social transaction as the basic building blocks of theory. We argue that while both approaches can be fruitful, theories of processes and relations are better suited to address certain questions, most notably those involving change in global politics. Drawing on work in International Relations, sociology and philosophy, we examine what such theories entail and discuss areas of research for which they are especially suited.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Is Agency?American Journal of Sociology, 1998
- Manifesto for a Relational SociologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1997
- Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International PoliticsInternational Organization, 1997
- Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434American Journal of Sociology, 1993
- Levels of analysis vs. agents and structures: part IIIReview of International Studies, 1992
- Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politicsInternational Organization, 1992
- The agent-structure problem in international relations theoryInternational Organization, 1987
- Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of EmbeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1985
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and PositionsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1976