Editor's Introduction: Understanding Regulatory Enforcement
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Law & Policy
- Vol. 11 (2) , 89-119
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1989.tb00022.x
Abstract
This issue of Law & Policy adds to the growing body of empirical case studies of decision‐making and enforcement in regulatory agencies. Summarizing that research, regulatory enforcement styles can be described in terms of two dimensions, one concerning the ways in which regulatory violations are defined and punished, the other concerning outcomes, described in policy‐evaluative terms. In explaining variation in enforcement style, existing studies point to three sets of factors: characteristics of the regulatory “legal design”; features of agencies' “task environment”; and the regulatory “political environment.” Weighting the relative importance of these factors, however, is difficult because of the number and fluidity of variables and the adaptiveness of regulatory agencies.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regulatory Attitudes and Behavior: The Case of Surface Mining RegulationThe Western Political Quarterly, 1988
- Gaining Regulatory ComplianceAdministration & Society, 1988
- An Enforcement Taxonomy of Regulatory AgenciesLaw & Policy, 1987
- The Regulation of Nursing Homes: A Comparative PerspectiveThe Milbank Quarterly, 1987
- Negotiated Non‐Compliance: A Case Study of Regulatory FailureLaw & Policy, 1987
- Regulatory Enforcement in a Federalist SystemAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- Assessing the Consequences of Corporate Discretion on Regulatory Compliance: The Case of Motor Vehicle Safety in CanadaLaw & Policy, 1986
- Cooperation, Deterrence, and the Ecology of Regulatory EnforcementLaw & Society Review, 1984
- The Behavior of Administrative AgenciesThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1972