Communicating Low Risk Magnitudes: Incidence Rates Expressed as Frequency Versus Rates Expressed as Probability
- 1 August 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 17 (4) , 507-510
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00891.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertaintyCognition, 1996
- How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Psychological Review, 1995
- Risk Communication: Absolute versus Relative Expressions of Low-Probability RisksOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- The Risks of “Putting the Numbers in Context”: A Cautionary TaleRisk Analysis, 1994
- High Risk or Low: How Location on a “Risk Ladder” Affects Perceived RiskRisk Analysis, 1994
- What Do We Know About Making Risk Comparisons?Risk Analysis, 1990
- The Psychology of Contraceptive Surprises: Cumulative Risk and Contraceptive Effectiveness1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1990
- Perception of RiskScience, 1987
- The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of ChoiceScience, 1981
- Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspectiveAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1978