Is early invasive treatment of unstable coronary artery disease equally effective for both women and men?
- 25 June 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 38 (1) , 41-48
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01308-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Is there a bias against performing coronary revascularization in women?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Gender Differences in Clinical Evaluation and Triage in Coronary Artery DiseaseChest, 1995
- Do women with acute myocardial infarction receive the same treatment as men?BMJ, 1994
- Differences between men and women in hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.Circulation, 1993
- Acute Myocardial Infarction: Difference in the Treatment between Men and WomenInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1993
- Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women. 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry.Circulation, 1993
- Differences in the Use of Procedures between Women and Men Hospitalized for Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in WomenCardiology, 1990
- Comparison of the long-term, postsurgical survival of women and men in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS)American Heart Journal, 1989