Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Psychology Review
- Vol. 17 (8) , 881-901
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00056-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 111 references indexed in Scilit:
- Publication bias and the evaluation of psychotherapy efficacy in reviews of the research literatureClinical Psychology Review, 1996
- Reply to comments on Lipsey and Wilson (1993).American Psychologist, 1995
- Meta-analysis squared—does it make sense?American Psychologist, 1995
- The value of goodness‐of‐fit indices in meta‐analysis: A comment on Hall and RosenthalCommunication Monographs, 1992
- The uses of meta‐analysis: Making knowledge claims and setting research agendasCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Meta‐analysis for primary and secondary data analysis: The super‐experiment metaphorCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Testing for moderator variables in meta‐analysis: Issues and methodsCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979