The effect of urea on the utilization of ground, pelleted roughage by penned sheep: II. Utilization of organic matter, nitrogen and minerals

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Adult Merino wethers were fed for 16 weeks on diets of oat straw mixed with urea and pelleted (A); oat straw pellets, with access to a salt block (B); oat straw pellets, with access to a salt-urea block (C); Phalaris straw mixed with urea and pelleted (D); and Phalaris straw pellets (E). A commercial mineral supplement was given during the first 8 weeks, and a laboratory-prepared complete mineral supplement supplied during the second 8 weeks. During the fifth to eighth weeks (period I), and the thirteenth to sixteenth weeks (period II), digestibility and balance studies were conducted on sheep from each treatment.Digestibilities of organic matter (O.M.) and cellulose were generally increased by the addition of urea, but only in one comparison, between diets A and B, was the difference significant. Urea did not significantly affect water intake in relation to food intake.Urea increased nitrogen (N) intake, faecal and urinary N excretion, and N balance, these effects being more pronounced in period II. All sheep were in negative N status in period I; five of the 12 urea-fed sheep were in positive N status in period II. In diets B and C water intake and urine output were positively related to salt intake, but in no diet was there a significant relation between urinary N excretion and total output of urine.Sulphur balances (excluding wool) were generally positive and did not improve significantly in period II despite higher sulphur intakes. However, a corresponding increase in the intake of phosphorus, from 0·5 g/day to about 2·0 g/day, brought nearly all sheep from negative to positive phosphorus balance. With the urea diets there was a significant, negative relation between urinary N excretion and phosphorus balance.Intakes of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium appeared to be sufficient in both periods.It seems likely that the improved response to urea which occurred during the experiment was due to the change in mineral supplementation rather than to adaptation to urea.