Do We Have the Infant Mortality Rate We Desire?
- 3 July 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 266 (1) , 114-115
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03470010118042
Abstract
WHY DO we decry the United States' infant mortality rate? Don't we have the rate we want? Sarcasm? Yes. Overstatement? No! If we polled the nation's political and health care leaders about these questions, they would hasten to dismiss them as sheer nonsense. After all, everyone knows how tragic it is that the United States ranks behind essentially all industrialized nations in infant mortality. Furthermore, our poor standing is not just a matter of variance in reporting; we really do very poorly when compared with other, similar nations. Thus, there seems to be a clear answer to the first question, "Of course we decry the infant mortality rate, we are doing very poorly." The second question cannot be dismissed as easily. If we do not have the rate we desire, what are we doing to change the situation? Government leaders will note that we are providing more money for underprivilegedKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relationship of Unwed Status to Infant MortalityObstetrics & Gynecology, 1990
- Birthweight‐Specific Mortality: Important Inequalities Remain*The Journal of Rural Health, 1989
- Obstetric inertia: An obstacle to the prevention of prematurityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Maternal age, illegitimacy, and postneonatal mortality.BMJ, 1988
- Knowledge about Contraceptive Use and Conception among a Group of Urban, Black Adolescent MothersJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 1988
- Networks Nix Contraceptives AdScience, 1987
- Sex education and sexual experience among adolescents.American Journal of Public Health, 1985
- The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: A population study of perinatal systems in four statesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985