Biodegradation evaluation of polyether and polyester‐urethanes with oxidative and hydrolytic enzymes
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Vol. 28 (10) , 1187-1199
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820281009
Abstract
Enzyme‐induced liberation of components from seven different radiolabeled polyurethanes was monitored by radiolabel counting of the incubation solutions and product isolation by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The polyurethanes were selected to reflect variations in the hard‐segment chemistry, soft‐segment chemistry, soft‐segment chemistry, and polyurethane hydrophilicity resulting from combinations of hydrophobic/hydrophilic soft segments. All materials were characterized using electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, size exclusion chromatography, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The material surfaces were examined both before and after incubation with enzyme and control solutions using scanning electron microscopy. Biodegradation assays were carried out at 37°C using cholesterol esterase (CE) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) under optimal pH conditions for each enzyme. The hydrolytic enzyme (CE) was effective in releasing degradation products that contained hard‐segment components from some of the polyurethanes. HPLC analysis of products for a polyesterurethane synthesized with toluene diisocyanate (TDI) suggested that the bulk of the incorporated radiolabeled TDI was still covalently bonded within the cleaved chain segments of the original polymer and was not released as pure toluene diamine (TDA). The data suggest that urethane linkages in the soft‐segment domains of phase separated polyetherurea‐urethanes may be more prone to cleavage by CE than are the urea/urethane groups in the hard‐segment domains. This could be related to the nature of the hard‐segment domain structures. The oxidative enzyme (HRP) was not able to induce liberation of radiolabeled segments from either the polyether or polyester‐based polyurethanes. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variations between biomer lots. 2: The effect of differences between lots on in vitro enzymatic and oxidative degradation of a commercial polyurethaneJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1993
- Enzyme–biomaterial interactions: Effect of biosystems on degradation of polyurethanesJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1993
- The Polyurethane Foam Covering the Même Breast Prosthesis: A Biomedical Breakthrough or a Biomaterial Tar Baby?Annals of Plastic Surgery, 1992
- Effect of sulfonation of segmented polyurethanes on the transient adsorption of fibrinogen from plasma: Possible correlation with anticoagulant behaviorJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1992
- Horseradish peroxidase catalyzed oxidation of thiocyanate by hydrogen peroxide: comparison with lactoperoxidase-catalysed oxidation and role of distal histidineBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, 1991
- Effect of some additives on the biostability of a poly(etherurethane) elastomerJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1991
- Polyurethane-Covered Mammary Prosthesis: A Nine Year Follow-Up AssessmentJournal of Biomaterials Applications, 1991
- The biocompatibility of solution cast and acetone‐extracted cast biomerJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1986
- Autooxidative Degradation of Implanted Polyether Polyurethane DevicesJournal of Biomaterials Applications, 1986
- Porcine cholesterol esterase, a multiform enzymeBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, 1983