Developmental dyslexics do not fit in boxes: Evidence from six new case studies

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Six subjects with a reading problem were tested on a variety of reading and other tasks including tests of phonological awareness and processing, short-term memory, visual analysis and synthesis, memory for faces and pictures, and matching of letters and shapes. The subjects demonstrated differences in their reading strategies, but these showed no relation to any differences in the patterns of deficit on non-reading tasks. Five of them showed severe problems on tasks involving phonological processing and short-term memory but the seventy of these was unrelated to reading strategy. There were some indications of visual weaknesses, but these were severe in only one subject who had a pronounced defect in memory for faces; there was no evidence that the visual weaknesses were consistently related to reading ability or strategy. It is concluded that all the subjects in this sample (with one 'possible exception) had a deficit in phonological processing but adopted different strategies to cope with this when faced with the task of converting print to sound. Differences in strategy are likely to be affected by the relative efficiency of other cognitive processes, personality and introdctional factors.

This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit: