The States
- 6 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 330 (1) , 75-79
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199401063300128
Abstract
In the absence of federal action, many states, squeezed by recession1 and spiraling health care costs, have approved or are moving toward the enactment of legislation that would reform the way health care is paid for and provided within their borders. The legislation ranges from comprehensive plans with the goal of providing all citizens with health insurance through public subsidies and coverage financed jointly by employers and employees to less ambitious laws that reform the small-group insurance market, establish new cost-containment mechanisms, or create study commissions. State medical societies have generally been supportive of these reform efforts, except when legislatures . . .Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Framework of Health Care ReformNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Problems with Employer-Provided Health Insurance — The Employee Retirement Income Security Act and Health Care ReformNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Health Care Reform in MinnesotaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The States and Health Care ReformNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Commentary: Measuring the Candidates on Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The Oregon Medicaid Demonstration Project — Will It Provide Adequate Medical Care?New England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Mending the Flaws in the Small-Group MarketHealth Affairs, 1992
- The Shortcomings of Voluntarism in the Small-Group Insurance MarketHealth Affairs, 1992
- The Impact of Foundation-Funded Commissions on Health PolicyHealth Affairs, 1992
- The National Politics of Oregon's Rationing PlanHealth Affairs, 1991