Attribution of Responsibility and Crime Seriousness
- 1 November 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 121 (6) , 607-613
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1987.9712690
Abstract
In this study we observed the effects of type of damage, magnitude of damage, and apprehension or escape of the offender upon the perceived seriousness of the offense, perceived freedom and intent exercised by the offender, and perceived duration of the crime. Contrary to previous results, personal crimes were judged to be more serious than property crimes only when the offender escaped arrest. Results confirmed previous findings that an increase in the negative consequences of the crime led to higher ratings of criminal intent. Perceived duration and assessments of crime seriousness were positively related to attribution of responsibility.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Authoritarianism and Sentencing Strategies for Low and High Severity CrimesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1986
- Assignment of Punishment as a Function of the Severity and Consequences of the Crime and the Status of the Defendant1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1986
- Extra-Legal Variables Affecting Sentencing DecisionsPsychological Reports, 1982
- Effects of Legal Education and Work Experience on Perceptions of Crime SeriousnessSocial Problems, 1981
- Effects of Retaliation Latency and Provocation Level on Judged Blameworthiness for Retaliatory AggressionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978
- Determinants of Perceived AggressionThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1976
- Effects of actor's causal role, outcome severity, and knowledge of prior accidents upon attributions of responsibilityJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976
- Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970