Determination of indinavir and nelfinavir trough plasma concentration efficacy thresholds according to virological response in HIV‐infected patients
Open Access
- 5 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in HIV Medicine
- Vol. 5 (4) , 307-313
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2004.00226.x
Abstract
Background There is evidence to suggest a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationship in HIV-infected patients receiving protease inhibitor (PI)-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); however, the effective trough PI plasma concentrations achieved have not been precisely determined. Methods The relationship between HIV viral load and concomitant PI trough plasma concentration (Ctrough) was evaluated in 101 patients receiving at least 4 months of thrice daily indinavir (IDV)-containing (n=68) or nelfinavir (NFV)-containing (n=33) HAART. The more discriminating Ctrough efficacy thresholds were determined statistically for each PI by using the raw Ctrough and the time-corrected Ctrough, using the precise delay since the last PI intake and the half-life of each PI. Results For IDV (P=0.002) and NFV (P=0.019) median Ctrough levels were higher in patients with undetectable viral load [0.23 mg/L (n=30) and 2.3 mg/L (n=16) respectively] than in patients with detectable viral load [0.11 mg/L (n=38) and 0.6 mg/L (n=17) respectively]. Ctrough levels of IDV (r=−0.45; Pr=−0.43; P=0.011) were correlated with the concomitant viral load. The more discriminating Ctrough efficacy thresholds were estimated statistically as 0.12 mg/L for IDV and 0.5 mg/L for NFV. When Ctrough values were time-corrected, the Ctrough efficacy thresholds, 8 h after the last intake, were 0.15 mg/L for IDV and 0.65 mg/L for NFV. Conclusions These results support the importance of achieving minimal effective Ctrough to improve the virological efficacy of PI-containing HAART, and specify the target concentrations for IDV and NFV.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Critical Evaluation of the Therapeutic Range of IndinavirAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2002
- Randomized, double-blind comparison of two nelfinavir doses plus nucleosides in HIV-infected patients (Agouron study 511)AIDS, 2001
- The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in treatment of HIV infectionBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2001
- A Retrospective, Cohort-Based Survey of Patients Using Twice-Daily Indinavir + Ritonavir Combinations: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and EfficacyJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2001
- Pharmacological Basis for Concentration-Controlled Therapy with Zidovudine, Lamivudine, and IndinavirAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- Drug Resistance and Predicted Virologic Responses to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor TherapyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Pharmacodynamics of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease InhibitorsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Treatment with Indinavir, Zidovudine, and Lamivudine in Adults with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Prior Antiretroviral TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- A Controlled Trial of Two Nucleoside Analogues plus Indinavir in Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and CD4 Cell Counts of 200 per Cubic Millimeter or LessNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Determination of L-735 524, an human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor, in human plasma and urine via high-performance liquid chromatography with column switchingJournal of Chromatography A, 1995